Research
The math is the product.
SCSA's guarantees are written down and peer-reviewable. Full papers and validation reports are available to qualified partners under briefing.
Conventional vaults vs SCSA
| Property | Conventional | SCSA |
|---|---|---|
| Key management | A single operator holds the key | t-of-n threshold MPC: no single party can decrypt |
| Time-locking | “Trust us” policy enforcement | Sequential time-locks: iterated hashing that cannot be parallelized |
| Tamper evidence | Editable access logs | Hash-chained audit log under Merkle commitment |
| Forward secrecy | Static keys persist | State ratchet: old keys securely zeroed |
| Post-quantum | RSA / ECC only | ML-DSA-65 (FIPS 204) hybrid signing · hash-based STARK |
| Hardware binding | None: keys are portable | GPU attestation · TPM2 · TEE measurement-derived keys |
| Access privacy | Provider sees every access | Path ORAM: patterns indistinguishable from random |
No trusted setup and no lattice assumption in the proof system: security rests on collision-resistant hashing, so the transparency proofs stand against quantum adversaries. Signatures and encapsulation are ML-DSA-65 / ML-KEM-768 hybrids, aligned to FIPS 203/204.